Against A Human Hire
The comparison most owners are actually making. It is not a clean win in every row, and the last row is the one that matters most.
Against The Other AI
Good software exists in every one of these categories. Here is who we think should buy them instead of us.
Legal AI, built for large firms
Harvey
Excellent at what it does, and sold to the firms that can staff it. It is one profession deep, priced and implemented for an enterprise legal department.
We run the legal assistant as one of four agents, sized for the practice that has a front desk rather than a procurement process.
One trade, one workflow
Single-vertical point tools
A receptionist bot for clinics, a booking bot for salons, an intake bot for law offices. Each is good in its lane and stops at the lane markings.
Front desk, call center, insurance and legal are the same agent wearing four hats — one vendor, one bill, one thing to learn.
A model with your FAQ attached
General-purpose chatbots
Cheap, quick to switch on, and they answer questions. They do not hold the calendar, take the payment or file the form.
The agent executes. It books the slot, sends the reminder, chases the no-show and writes the outcome back to your system of record.
No-code plus an API key
Build it yourself
Real and viable, and it becomes a second job. Someone owns the prompts, the phone number, the outages and the bill.
We own the runtime. You get the week-opening Q&A and a stack whose monthly cost is published before you sign anything.
